<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave Preparing to add Document Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/</link>
	<description>discussing all things (Google) Wave</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 05:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshinywave.com/?p=634#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Thomas,

MSON is a great product. Many of my collogues use it daily for all note taking and bringing together different documents on one &quot;binder&quot; (for lack of a better word). I like it a lot. With the  MAC Office (which I use) you have a Word Notebook template which kind of acts similar to OneNote. It is great again for keeping a meeting note book/scrapbook type of functionality. 

However, it does not allow for any type of real-time collaboration between teams. So, I&#039;m not convinced that there is a real comparative review to be done. Think of OneNote of bringing many documents together in one place and Google Wave as trying to bring many documents and people together in one place.

If anybody is using MS OneNote (PC Version) please jump in and offer your review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right; margin:1em"><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/fc43cfddd230c3f313cd1c6581257823?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theshinywave.com%2Fwp-content%2Fgallery%2Fblog-images%2Favatar-2.jpg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></div>
<p>Thomas,</p>
<p>MSON is a great product. Many of my collogues use it daily for all note taking and bringing together different documents on one &#8220;binder&#8221; (for lack of a better word). I like it a lot. With the  MAC Office (which I use) you have a Word Notebook template which kind of acts similar to OneNote. It is great again for keeping a meeting note book/scrapbook type of functionality. </p>
<p>However, it does not allow for any type of real-time collaboration between teams. So, I&#8217;m not convinced that there is a real comparative review to be done. Think of OneNote of bringing many documents together in one place and Google Wave as trying to bring many documents and people together in one place.</p>
<p>If anybody is using MS OneNote (PC Version) please jump in and offer your review.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshinywave.com/?p=634#comment-412</guid>
		<description>It seems like from my research, the MSON is better at collecting documents (true/false?), but is hardware limited compared to GW.  Otherwise, to the user, they are relatively the same (ignoring GW performance issues), sort of, kind of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right; margin:1em"><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/1335ecdcbfbd80e781a19d141e04979d?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theshinywave.com%2Fwp-content%2Fgallery%2Fblog-images%2Favatar-2.jpg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></div>
<p>It seems like from my research, the MSON is better at collecting documents (true/false?), but is hardware limited compared to GW.  Otherwise, to the user, they are relatively the same (ignoring GW performance issues), sort of, kind of.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshinywave.com/?p=634#comment-411</guid>
		<description>How come you didn&#039;t include Microsoft OneNote in your list of collaboration tools?  I&#039;ve been looking for a comparative review between the two products (GW and MSON).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right; margin:1em"><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/1335ecdcbfbd80e781a19d141e04979d?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theshinywave.com%2Fwp-content%2Fgallery%2Fblog-images%2Favatar-2.jpg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></div>
<p>How come you didn&#8217;t include Microsoft OneNote in your list of collaboration tools?  I&#8217;ve been looking for a comparative review between the two products (GW and MSON).
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Graversen</title>
		<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Graversen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshinywave.com/?p=634#comment-410</guid>
		<description>It sure looks like Goolge is out with the big wallet and doing christmas shopping. 
But yes it would be nice to be able to do more collaborative document editing in wave. But it does take some time before google are able to implement all the news from thise companies. I would not expect any major improvement in the next few months. 
IO10 could be a where major Wave news will be announced.
.-= Daniel Graversen&#180;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.masteringwave.com/2009/12/wavecalendar-21-translatey/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WaveCalendar 21: Translatey&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right; margin:1em"><img alt='' src='http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/5bc1397a006c1e36d648b43e05b5c696?s=80&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theshinywave.com%2Fwp-content%2Fgallery%2Fblog-images%2Favatar-2.jpg%3Fs%3D80&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' /></div>
<p>It sure looks like Goolge is out with the big wallet and doing christmas shopping.<br />
But yes it would be nice to be able to do more collaborative document editing in wave. But it does take some time before google are able to implement all the news from thise companies. I would not expect any major improvement in the next few months.<br />
IO10 could be a where major Wave news will be announced.<br />
.-= Daniel Graversen&#180;s last blog ..<a href="http://www.masteringwave.com/2009/12/wavecalendar-21-translatey/" rel="nofollow">WaveCalendar 21: Translatey</a> =-.
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.theshinywave.com/collaboration/google-wave-preparing-to-add-document-collaboration/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshinywave.com/?p=634#comment-409</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by dgraversen: RT @ShinyWave: New blog post: Google Wave Preparing to add Document Collaboration http://bit.ly/71pguu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by dgraversen: RT @ShinyWave: New blog post: Google Wave Preparing to add Document Collaboration <a href="http://bit.ly/71pguu.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/71pguu..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

